In The Name Of God The Most Merciful, Most Compassionate

Killing Osama: justice or vengeance?

by Phyllis Bennis
Source: Institute for Policy Studies

Filed under: Opinion |

May 3 2011

U.S. agents killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, apparently without cooperation from the government in Islamabad. The al-Qaeda leader was responsible for great suffering; I do not mourn his death. But every action has causes and consequences, and in the current moment all are dangerous. It’s unlikely that bin Laden’s killing will have much impact on the already weakened capacity of al-Qaeda, which is widely believed to be made up of only a couple hundred fighters between Afghanistan and Pakistan — though its effect on other terrorist forces is uncertain. Pakistan itself may pay a particularly high price.

As President Barack Obama described it, “After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden.” Assuming that was indeed the case, this raid reflects the brutal reality of the deadly wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that preceded it and that continue today, 10 years later — it wasn’t about bringing anyone to justice, it was about vengeance.

And given the enormous human costs still being paid by Afghans, Iraqis, Pakistanis, and others in the U.S. wars waged in the name of capturing bin Laden, it’s particularly ironic that in the end it wasn’t the shock-and-awe airstrikes or invasions of ground troops, but rather painstaking police work — careful investigation, cultivating intelligence sources — that made possible the realization of that goal.

President Obama acknowledged that the post-9/11 unity of the people of the United States “has at times frayed.” But he didn’t mention that that unity had actually collapsed completely within 24 hours of the horrifying attacks on the twin towers. September 11, 2001 didn’t “change the world;” the world was changed on September 12, when George W. Bush announced his intention to take the world to war in response. That was the moment that the actual events of 9/11, a crime against humanity that killed nearly 3,000 people, were left behind and the “global war on terror” began. That GWOT war has brought years of war, devastation and destruction to hundreds of thousands around the world, in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and beyond.

There was an unprecedented surge of unity, of human solidarity, in response to the crime of 9/11. In the United States much of that response immediately took on a jingoistic and xenophobic frame (some of which showed up again last night in the aggressive chants of “USA, USA!!” from flag-waving, cheering crowds outside the White House following President Obama’s speech). Some of it was overtly militaristic, racist and Islamophobic. But some really did reflect a level of human unity unexpected and rare in U.S. history. Even internationally, solidarity with the U.S. people for a brief moment replaced the well-deserved global anger at U.S. arrogance, wars, and drive towards empire. In France, headlines proclaimed “nous sommes tous Américaines maintenant.” We are all Americans now.

But that human solidarity was short-lived. It was destroyed by the illegal wars that shaped the U.S. response to the 9/11 crime. Those wars quickly created numbers of victims far surpassing the 3,000 killed on September 11. The lives of millions more around the world were transformed in the face of U.S. aggression — in Pakistan alone, where a U.S. military team assassinated bin Laden, thousands of people have been killed and maimed by U.S. drone strikes and the suicide bombs that are part of the continuing legacy of the U.S. war.

These wars have brought too much death and destruction. Too many people have died and too many children have been orphaned for the United States to claim, as President Obama’s triumphantly did, that “justice has been done” because one man, however symbolically important, has been killed. However one calculates when and how “this fight” actually began, the U.S. government chose how to respond to 9/11. And that response, from the beginning, was one of war and vengeance — not of justice.

The president’s speech last night could have aimed to put an end to the triumphalism of the “global war on terror” that George W. Bush began and Barack Obama claimed as his own. It could have announced a new U.S. foreign policy based on justice, equality, and respect for other nations. But it did not. It declared instead that the U.S. war in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, and beyond will continue.

In that reaffirmation of war, President Obama reasserted the American exceptionalism that has been a hallmark of his recent speeches, claiming that “America can do whatever we set our mind to.” He equated the U.S. ability and willingness to continue waging ferocious wars, with earlier accomplishments of the U.S. — including, without any trace of irony, the “struggle for equality for all our citizens.” In President Obama’s iteration, the Global War on Terror apparently equals the anti-slavery and civil rights movements.

Today, the Arab Spring is on the rise across the Middle East and North Africa. It’s ineffably sad that President Obama, in his claim that bin Laden’s death means justice, didn’t use the opportunity to announce the end of the deadly U.S. wars that answered the attacks of 9/11. This could have been a moment to replace vengeance with cooperation, replace war with justice.

But it was not. Regardless of bin Laden’s death, as long as those deadly U.S. wars continue in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, and beyond, justice has not been done.

UmmerFarooq 5pts

What a load of BS. We all know that his family was close with the Bush's. We all know that he helped America in the Cold War. We all know that he had no part in 9/11. We all know that he never was killed in Pakistan.

Peter 5pts

If Osama Bin Laden, had acted alone, with no help from others I would totally agree with this article.

However, tens of thousands actively supported him, millions praised OBL for his actions and the Internet is full of websites and videos of Muslims telling how they want to destroy the US and the West.

The vast bulk of Muslims are really peaceful and honest people. HOWEVER, evil only truly triumphs when good men do nothing, and too many good Muslims have sat in silence and let the lunatic fringe of Islam dictate how the world sees Islam.

The silence of the majority of Muslims, on the matter of extremist Muslims means the world has a negative image of Muslims. Crying how evil the US is just more denial by the peaceful majority of Muslims who let the extremists do as they want.

Until the Muslim world loudly condemns the actions of the terrorists, who claim to be doing the work of Allah, and condemn loudly that these extremists are not acting as Islam demands, the rest of the world will equate Islam with terrorism.

Only Muslims applaud these terrorist acts, and until the vast majority of Muslims stand up and take back their religion, evil on both side will continue to grow.

I constantly hear Muslims say Westerners need to educate themselves about Islam, that Muslims are misunderstood. The problems is that Muslims don't understand Islam.

Muslims want the West to view Islam as it is written, and they don't understand that the West sees Islam by what its followers do, and the acts of Muslims reflect what Islam is. Unfortunately the few Muslims that act badly are what the West sees, they also see good Muslims doing nothing to stop the bad ones.

Darnell Hines
Darnell Hines 5pts

Global War on Terrorism..... what exactly is a terrorist? why did Osama order the attack of 9/11? wasnt there a purpose for all of this.. i believe so. The United States is not innocent in any way, shape or form.

Your Support of is currently needed. Please sign up with any amount you can to support us through membership.