In The Name Of God The Most Merciful, Most Compassionate
Like the great majority of the world’s Muslims, I am an orthodox Muslim: neither an “Islamist” nor a “radical jihadist.” Orthodox and authentic Islam is an inclusive, deep, beautiful and wisdom-based religion.
From the earliest times, Muslims routinely incorporated pre-Islamic institutions, laws and customs into their practice when they did not violate the Quran or the Prophet’s directives. In Malaysia, for example, this was known as adat Melayu, which had the force of law according to the Syariah.
Drawing on the Quran and the Hadith, Muslim historians, theologians and jurists developed an Islamic history and theology drawn partly from Christian and Jewish texts, commentaries, spiritual practice, theology and jurisprudence. The spires of Christian churches calling the pious with ringing bells metamorphosed into tall minarets from which the muezzinwould call the faithful to prayer.
And the distinctive dome of the Byzantine Orthodox Cathedral Hagia Sophia, built more than 30 years before the birth of the Prophet, was adopted by Muslims as a ubiquitous fixture of later mosques.
The past half-century has fostered the myth that all knowledge other than that contained in the Quran and the sayings of the Prophet are “un-Islamic.” But history shows us that it was an enlightened tradition of seeking out, engaging, embracing and absorbing knowledge and wisdom in all fields of human endeavour that is the true Muslim reality.
I am a Kuwaiti-born, Egyptian-American citizen. I grew up in Great Britain, Malaysia and Egypt, and have lived in the US since 1965, when I was 17. I attended Simpang Lima primary school in Klang, and the Victoria Institution in Kuala Lumpur, before studying at Columbia University in New York and graduate school at Stevens Institute of Technology in New Jersey.
I became a naturalised American citizen in 1979. I am an imam and the son of an eminent Egyptian imam and scholar, who was sent by al-Azhar University to be the imam and director of the Islamic Center in New York, and then of the Islamic Center in Washington DC Before that, he was the first principal of the Muslim College Klang, the first Head of the Islamic Studies Department at the University of Malaya, and the first Rector of the International Islamic University in Kuala Lumpur.
We arrived in New York in December 1965 to a new life in the US, and I have served since 1983 at the Al-Farah Mosque in Tribeca, about a dozen blocks from the former World Trade Center.
Like my father, I have been deeply involved in interfaith work for well over a quarter century now with all faith communities, but mainly with Jews, Christians and Buddhists. In the aftermath of 9/11, as imam of a mosque so near Ground Zero, I was in demand as a speaker on extremists and terrorists, on the relationship between the Muslim world and the West, helping non-Muslim Americans understand the nature of the divide.
When I opened the floor to questions, they invariably fell into three categories: first was the “What is Islam?” class of questions, such as, “What is the difference between Sunni, Shia, and Sufi? What is the role of women in Islam? Does Islam believe in separation of church and state?”
The second category was what I called “The 9/11 questions,” such as “Why is bin Laden popular in the Muslim world?” “Why are Muslims so angry at America?” “Why do political liberation movements in the Muslim world use the language of Islam?” “Is suicide bombing allowed in Islam?”
The third category contained just one question, and while I succeeded in answering the questions very well in the first two categories, my efforts to provide answers to the third left me deeply dissatisfied.
Fighting extremism
This question first cropped up when my friend, Rabbi David Rosen, invited me to address the quarterly Board of Governors meeting of the American Jewish Committee on Dec 10, 2001 – 90 days after 9/11. The audience unanimously agreed with me that the status quo between Jews and Muslims was unacceptable.
But they went further; they pushed me on what we could do together to improve this relationship, and specifically, what we could do to turn around US-Muslim world relations.
I talked generally about mutually educating each other about our religions and cultures. At the same time, I knew cultural and religious appreciation could not by itself transform a relationship that had gone very wrong. Three months later, at the end of a lecture I gave at the Greenwich (Connecticut) Presbyterian Church, an elderly lady stood up and asked me, “What can a good Christian woman like me do to help?”
Here again was the same question, and I could not answer it!
And if I could not, who could? This question, hugely important to answer, stayed with me for months. I knew I had to do some serious study and thinking. I soon realised that to resolve the problems that people referred to as “Muslims versus the West,” or the “US-Muslim divide,” we all needed something concrete that could help bridge the growing polarisation between America and the Muslim world, and between Muslim Americans and their non-Muslim neighbours.
I spent more than a year analysing the problems and figuring out what it would take to bridge this divide.
The result was the Cordoba Initiative in November 2002 which I created with the help of my friend John S. Bennett, the former Vice-President of the Aspen Institute in Colorado.
We named it after the 300-year period (8th–11th centuries) of the Cordoba Caliphate (in what is now Spain) during which Jews, Christians and Muslims lived in the most enlightened, pluralistic and tolerant society on earth.
Cordoba began as a multi-faith initiative designed to bridge West-Muslim world relations by breaking the cycle of mistrust, misunderstanding and irrational fear that exists between Islam and the Western world. It became clear, from invitations to international forums, that it had to be multinational. With the support of then Malaysian Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, we made Kuala Lumpur our Muslim world headquarters, with New York City our Western world headquarters.
One project of this initiative has been the Shariah Index Project to define the meaning of the term “Islamic State” from an Islamic legal point of view, and then to measure such “Islamicity” meaningfully – including that of non-Muslim-majority nations.
This would help determine the proper balance in the Muslim world (and elsewhere) between institutions of political power and authority, on the one hand, and institutions of religious power and authority, on the other – the Muslim equivalent of the religion-state relationship.
In the US, church-state separation is practically a religious precept; not so in the Muslim world. The work of this group is a powerful antidote to the perversion of Islam that is currently shaping so much of the political-religious discourse in the Muslim world. It is even more relevant now in the wake of the 2011 Arab Spring and the concern that many Westerners have about the role of Islamic religious parties, such as the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
Cordoba House was another of the Initiative’s projects, designed as a community centre and a multi-faith space at 51 Park Place, in the same lower Manhattan neighbourhood of Tribeca, about 10 blocks south of my mosque on West Broadway.
My longer-term interfaith vision, which I had wanted to realise for 20 years, was to establish an Islamic community centre modelled on the Y’s – the YMCA, YWCA, YMHA, YWHA – originally religious institutions serving their own people that have become genuine, whole community institutions in American cities.
The remarkable 92nd Street Y, for instance, on New York’s Upper East Side, now reaches a diverse range of people with a rich variety of programmes, lectures, and concerts, though it was originally intended only for Jews.
I intended Cordoba House to be a “Muslim 92nd Street Y,” with an interfaith board, interfaith worship space, a dedicated Islamic prayer space (a mosque) in a building that would architecturally be thoroughly American – not a transplant from 13th century Cairo.
But Cordoba House, now known indelibly, if inaccurately, worldwide as the Ground Zero Mosque, became a flashpoint in 2010 for all of the unhealed wounds of 9/11, and for opportunistic Islamophobes throughout the US and the world. That this effort aroused such controversy and vitriol demonstrates the size of the task that confronts us if we truly wish to erase our misunderstandings and misconceptions. But it also became a kind of Rorschach test for Americans and people all over the world.
Our office received thousands of letters, e-mails and phone calls of support from all 50 states and around the world, from Indonesia to Israel. Michael Bloomberg, the Jewish Mayor of New York, held a press conference to proclaim the city’s tradition of religious tolerance. New Yorkers held candlelight vigils on our behalf. President Barack Obama defended our constitutional right to build Cordoba House where we wished. These expressions confirmed my deep conviction that the great majority of Americans did not want to be at war with Muslims or the Muslim world.
In his 2011 State of the Union address, Obama uttered a sentence unthinkable for an American president a decade ago: “And as extremists try to inspire acts of violence within our borders, we are responding with the strength of our communities, with respect for the rule of law, and with the conviction that American Muslims are part of our American family.”
The entire Congress – Democrats and Republicans alike – rose in a spontaneous standing ovation.
As I took in Obama’s words and Congress’ applause on my television screen, tears welled up. It was not only the President’s words; it was the immediate, spontaneous bi-partisan response of the Congress – and it took place after the controversy over Cordoba House had exposed many raw emotions on all sides.
I felt a rush of emotion, convinced that I was watching the key turning point for American Muslims, and potentially for the entire complex of relations between the United States and the Muslim world.
Truly, as the proverb has it, the night is darkest just before the dawn. US-Muslim relations had bottomed out: the only direction to go from here was up – which is one reason I am so genuinely hopeful about the future.
The future
My fondest hope is for my Muslim brothers and sisters throughout the world to reclaim their fundamentally moderate and merciful religion from the extremist Muslims, and from the extremist non-Muslims who have made a profession out of distorting our religion. And that non-Muslims will understand the values and real traditions of our faith.
The real battleground is not between America and the Muslim world, or between Muslims and Jews, or Christians, or Hindus or atheists; the real conflict is between the moderates of all faith traditions, including moderate atheists, against all the extremists of all faith traditions, and that includes extremist atheists.
Agnostics and atheists can be as ethical or as immoral as any proclaimed Muslim. And it is with a deep sense of gratitude and pride to my Malaysian heritage that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak has championed this idea by launching the Global Movement of Moderates to rally all moderates of all religions against all extremists of all religions.
His speech on this at the United Nations last year, and at Oxford University in May, was widely regarded by US and European leaders, who are hoping that the new movements in the Arab world will look to nations like Malaysia as an example of how to build a successful and prosperous Islamic country that is democratic, religiously and ethnically pluralistic and moderate; a nation that confirms the overwhelming majority of the world’s 1.4 billion Muslims’ profound disagreement with the fundamentalist, narrow, parochial interpretations of Islam that have gained force in recent decades.
We are a nation (umma) that sees Orthodox Islam as far more beautiful, wise, truthful, open, and merciful: a tradition and a faith worth rescuing from the extremists.
■ This article is an extract from the introduction in Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf’s forthcoming new book, Moving The Mountain: Beyond Ground Zero To A New Vision Of Islam In America, which will be released by Free Press in May 2012.
Related Stories:
Get real. You as a muslim will not be accepted until you are no longer one, even if you use the prefix thrust upon you-'moderate'
We don't need to be accepted, just better understood so we can be left alone to live our lives, like everyone else.
It's unfortunate that the words moderate and fundamentalist have become labels for Muslims as they imply that being a close adherent to Islam is a bad thing. It obscures the truth which is that Islam teaches us to be more inclusive, kind and tolerant. The Prophet (pbuh) had the best of manners and anyone who has bad manners is not following him correctly. If simply having bad manners makes you a bad Muslim, then what of killing innocent people??
We need to get off our high horses and accept that Muslims are human, like everyone else and some of us deserve to be labelled as bad people because of our actions. Likewise, those of us who are trying to do the right thing should not be tarred with the same brush. As long as we continue to think of ourselves as victims, the Muslims who are giving Islam a bad name will use the rest of us to hide behind.
I used to hate the words "moderate" and "fundamentalist" as I think we are all just Muslims with varying levels of education, adherence and faith. However, I'm starting to think that, in the absence of any other mainstream term for distancing myself from the intolerant people in our community who like to drive wedges between people (both Muslim and Non-Muslim), I might just start calling myself a "moderate".
"We don't need to be accepted, just better understood so we can be left alone to live our lives, like everyone else. "
Here's the thing though. Islam is NOT isolationist. Indeed, its ultimate goal is to be established worldwide as the supreme spiritual and political force. And it has direct jurisprudence as to how the non Muslim should be treated. Harshest punishment for apostasy and blasphemy are firmly rooted in all sunni schools of jurisprudence - thus it is not benign and does not cultivate any sense of people being able to be "left alone to live their lives". So your desire seems thoroughly unIslamic.
Wow! A non-Muslim trying to tell Muslims what Islam is. I think we should leave Christianity to Christians, Islam to Muslims, Judaism to Jews and Pastafarianism to Pastafarians.
You have a right to your opinion and i have a right to ignore it.
People like you fan the flames of fear in our society. I know for a fact that your opinions are not representative of the majority of non-muslims. They are, by and large, decent people who, like most Muslims, want to be left alone to live their lives.
I think Jono is another false Imam spreading his version of fake Islam. Join the queue Jono, we are by now so used to such anti-muslim narrative commonly a tactic employed as a pretext to attack innocent Muslims that we can now spot you a mile away dude!
Jono, extremist elements in society exist in the white house as well as in the mountains of Afghanistan as well as the nonmuslim suburbs of Sydney. It is clearly a constant struggle to have society behave in harmony. This is why we have had law enforcement even BEFORE 9/11. The recent street riots in the UK occurred in a nonmuslim country, paedophilia occurs in all countries, domestic violence approaches a prevalence of one fifth of Australian women (more than the number of muslim households if you do some simple arithmetic, but you may need to consult your friendly primary school student for that one), alcohol fueled violence and illness kills more than any extremist ideology (and no Jono, before you get carried away with misquoting me i do not mean muslim extremists) could dream of, the market sponsored tobacco industry has killed millions per year ( incl the passive smoker), murders, suicide, lets not forget the poor Africans dying of famine and starvation every hour.
Mulsims have lived in harmony with nonmuslims in the past and continue to do so where i work and live in Australia and i have no design to convert my work colleagues to Islam i can assure you. I get along extremely well with my work colleagues who know i am muslim.
On the issue of women lets get facts straight Jono. More women are oppressed by their sexualisation in the West than you would probably like to admit to. On this point i would have to agree with commentators who say muslim women are also oppressed in many mus,im households, but if you can for a moment stretch your thinking abilities and consider this, this is a cultural phenomenon of male perception of superiority rather than an Islamic teaching, and yes we have to clean up our act here as muslims and non muslims. I want the mothers, sisters, daughters, wives, female friends, female work colleagues, aunts, nieces to live comfortably without any oppression. I will join your hand firmly in support of you in such a noble act.
But Jonno, look at your broad view of the world and consider your real intentions in this forum. Do you mean well? I ain't too sure of you mate!
No, my opinion is in line with Islamic scholars. Muslims tell non Muslims (kafirs) what Allah thinks of them all the time, and indeed your text is pretty clear as to how to kafir should be treated in an Islamic Caliphate.
My opinion is more Islamic than your watered down Western "everyone has the right to their own religion" version of Islam that is COMPLETELY unIslamic.
In the West, Islam is open for examination. Muslims do not have any exclusive licence by which to to talk about or advise about Islam. At this stage, from the article, superficial questions are being asked about Islam. Diplomatic responses are being fed. This is not satisfactory. Hence, Islam by non-Muslims is subject of examination as above.
"inclusive" - except for pagans, polytheists, agnostics, atheists, homosexuals... any non Muslim who doesn't qualify for dhimmi status (Jews and Christians who are not allowed to openly construct new religious centers and face death if for proselytism). And many would argue women, too...
I don't quite get the "inclusive" aspect of Islam.
I'll also add apostates (ie those who exercise their freewill to leave Islam). All sunni schools agree on the death penalty for this supposed crime.
All the anti Islam rhetoric is gettin boring mate, wake up from your slumber and embrace the family of humanity, You seem to be a victim of sensational stories which malign Islam based on the actions of a few and you incorrectly assume that is the reality. All societies have their horror stories which are far from the norm, I'm too intelligent to form opinions about people who are not Muslim who do the most hedious things that I see on my free to air news on Sydney stations every night because I know this is not a true representation of my non Muslim brothers/sisters. For all the bad news you whinge about then why are there so many multi millionaires, politicians, judges, celebrities living the life in Muslim countries ? I pity your hate and laugh at your ignorance.
Your continued support of MuslimVillage Inc assists in establishing and maintaining the following community initiatives:
Some quotes from the "moderate imam,
"“Well, I’m not a politician. ... The issue of terrorism is a very complex question. ... I am a bridge builder. My work is ... I do not want to be placed nor will I accept a position where I am the target of one side or another. My attempt is to see a peace in Israel. ... Targeting of civilians is wrong. It’s a sin in our religion, whoever does it. ... I am a supporter of the State of Israel.” "
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like