
By: MuslimVillage
Source: MuslimVillage.com
MuslimVillage.com has put together an Australian Muslim Voters Guide 2013 to help you decide who should get your vote in this weekend’s Federal Election.
We have analysed the three major parties policies, Labor, Liberal/National and the Greens, to present an explanation of not only the issues that will effect all Australians – see here: Australian Federal Election 2013 – Major Party Positions – but regardless of race or religion, what we believe are the key issues facing Australian Muslims.
Our analysis has shown that Australian Muslim voters could play a major role in deciding the outcome in up to 5 seats in the election. As the table below shows, Muslims are significant majorities in a number of seats that will help decide who wins the election. It is thus extremely important that you make your vote count.
This is especially critical for the Senate vote, where according to many election experts, there is a good possibility that Pauline Hanson could grab a seat in NSW with only 2% of the primary vote due to preference deals with other micro parties. If there is a hung senate, she may be one of a few from minor parties – mainly right wing – that hold the balance of power.
After examining all the issues specific to Australian Muslim interests, we believe it will not be in the Australian Muslim communities best interests to see a Tony Abbott lead Liberal/National government voted in. In fact, we believe that the incoming Liberal Government may end up being be one of the most right wing governments Australia has ever seen.
This may seem like a dramatic statement, but one only has to examine the many Islamophobic statements on sharia, halal, burqas, jihad, etc from senior Liberal politicians over the last few years to come to this conclusion – see Cory Bernadi, Sophie Mirabella, Concetta Fierravanti-Wells, Kevin Andrews, Bronwyn Bishop, Luke Simpkins, Scott Morrison, Fiona Scott, Ray King and of course the leader Tony Abbott. We have seen many utterances even over the last few weeks of the election campaign to determine that life for an Australian Muslim is not going to be an easy ride under a Liberal government.
On the flip side, does a Kevin Rudd lead Labor deserve another 3 years? After all the infighting and self indulgence over the last 6 years, for many the answer will be no. This despite the many social initiatives and reforms in education, disability and health care that they have proposed and introduced.
In addition, as a Australian Muslim, should we be voting for a Labor party that advocates for same sex marriage? The argument from some is that we live in a secular society that already socially recognises such practices regardless of the law and we need to look at the bigger picture of other issues that directly effect us. But each person voting for Labor – or the Greens – will be indirectly supporting allowing homosexuals to marry. This will play very heavily on many Australian Muslims minds.
So who should you vote for?
For starters, read all the information we have provided to help you decide. We also very highly recommend you use the Vote Compass website. It is an online tool developed by a non-profit group of political scientists and hosted by the ABC that has had an amazing 1.2million users in the last few weeks. You answer a short series of questions to discover which political party best represents your views. The results may surprise you. Here is the link : http://australia.votecompass.com/home
Another good way to decide who to vote for is to determine which local candidate in your area has been or will better serve your local community needs, and regardless of political affiliation, give them your vote.
Political Commentary by Ahmed Kilani, Editor-in-chief, MuslimVillage.com
Here is some information to help you decide who should get your valuable vote:

Australian Muslim Voters Guide 2013
DOWNLOAD the PDF here: https://muslimvillage.com/Aust-Fed-Elec-2013-Muslim-Voting-Guide.pdf
VIDEO: Parties pitch for Muslim vote
Both major parties have made a pitch for the Muslim vote during the 2013 federal election campaign. Vesna Nazor from SBS TV reports.
Australian Federal Election 2013 – Major Party Positions
DOWNLOAD the PDF here: https://muslimvillage.com/Aust-Fed-Elec-2013-Party-Comparisons.pdf
SEE ALSO
Australian Christian Lobby – Compare Aust Political Parties: sharia + religion + morals + social justice
The Australian Christian Lobby has produced an online guide that presents the political positions of some of the political parties standing for election in today’s Australian Federal election on issues of morality and justice.
There are many important issues covered that are also relevant to Australian Muslims – such as sharia law, freedom of religion and human rights, sexualisation of children, family and marriage.
The Australian Christian Lobby’s Australia Votes can be found here: www.australiavotes.org.au/policies
|
|
Family – MarriageMarriage is defined in the Marriage Act as the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life. Both houses of federal parliament overwhelmingly rejected a bill to redefine marriage in September 2012. What will your party do to protect the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman? |
|||||||||||||||||||
Australian Labor Party [View responses to all questions from the Australian Labor Party]
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Liberal Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Liberal Democratic Party] The LDP regards marriage as a private matter in which the government should have no role, beyond maintaining a register. It certainly should not decide who may or may not get married. The LDP would therefore remove all barriers to marriage between adults of any kind, while allowing churches and celebrants to discriminate as to who they wish to marry.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Family First [View responses to all questions from the Family First]
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Liberal National Coalition [View responses to all questions from the Liberal National Coalition]
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Democratic Labour Party of Australia [View responses to all questions from the Democratic Labour Party of Australia] DLP Senator John Madigan has already indicated to the Senate that he will be calling for a referendum to amend the Australian Constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman as currently in the Marriage Act. This is party policy. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Christian Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Christian Democratic Party]
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Australian Christians [View responses to all questions from the Australian Christians]
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Rise Up Australia Party [View responses to all questions from the Rise Up Australia Party]
RUAP believes in the protection of the traditional family unit, comprising man, woman and children; to promote marriage (as defined in the Marriage Act, 2004**) as an institution that provides the best nurturing environment for children and that has substantial economic benefits for society. While recognizing that adults are free to pursue their own sexuality in private, we reject and resist the promotion of homosexuality as a normal practice in schools and in public. We affirm the basic human right for a child to have both a male and a female as its parents (and to know who they are) in the best interests of the child. We oppose same-sex marriage, bigamy, polygamy and Centrelink funding of such and similar practices.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Family – ParentingPaid Parental Leave schemes allow a parent to take the necessary time to care for new children while retaining a place in the work force. However they are inequitable to a parent who chooses to care for children at home. What will your party do to redress this inequity? |
|
Australian Labor Party [View responses to all questions from the Australian Labor Party]
|
|
Liberal Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Liberal Democratic Party] The LDP does not believe in paid parental leave. Having children is a personal choice and it is immoral to ask others to pay. |
|
Family First [View responses to all questions from the Family First]
|
|
Liberal National Coalition [View responses to all questions from the Liberal National Coalition]
|
|
Democratic Labour Party of Australia [View responses to all questions from the Democratic Labour Party of Australia] The DLP believes that all families should be treated equitably. That child care payments should be available to mothers caring for their children at home. The Baby Bonus of $5000 should be available upon the birth of a child to mothers who are not in paid employment and are not eligible for Paid Parental Leave. |
|
Christian Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Christian Democratic Party] We are sympathetic to the stay at home parent and we believe that income splitting between married couples would assist in this regard and we would seek other measures subject to budget constraints. |
|
Australian Christians [View responses to all questions from the Australian Christians]
|
|
Rise Up Australia Party [View responses to all questions from the Rise Up Australia Party]
RUAP believes that any allowances should be equitable for all. We would join any committee that is looking into the issue.
|
|
Education – The National curriculumIt is important that school children have a balanced understanding of Australian history. However, the new National Curriculum all but ignores the transformative impact of Christianity on Western Civilisation. How will your party correct this imbalance? The Bible is the most printed and translated literary work in history. What will your party do to give the Bible adequate attention in the national curriculum? |
|
Rise Up Australia Party [View responses to all questions from the Rise Up Australia Party]
RUAP wishes to ensure that all school children are taught a curriculum that includes a balanced view of history, that includes the history of Western civilization (Greek, Roman and European), Aboriginal history, Magna Carta, Westminster democracy and the Judeo-Christian heritage that has come to us through, for example, the words of Henry Parkes, founding father, who said, “We are pre-eminently a Christian nation, as our laws, our whole system of jurisprudence, our constitution … are based upon and interwoven with our Christian beliefs”; We want our children to understand the heritage of Australia, our ancestors, our people, our law, legal system and the price that has been paid for our freedom (wars and conflicts). We oppose the teaching of Islam in schools as it promotes violence, but acknowledge the right for all languages, cultures and religions to be taught provided they are tolerant of other peoples and religions.
|
|
Liberal National Coalition [View responses to all questions from the Liberal National Coalition]
|
|
Family First [View responses to all questions from the Family First]
At Family First we are committed to choice in education. We believe that both public and private schools must be adequately resourced to enable the delivery of high quality education and to ensure that the rights of parents to choose is respected and supported. Many great organisations and political movements – the abolition of slavery, the civil rights movement, public education started in churches. Motivated by a sense of concern for others, people of goodwill established schools, hospitals, welfare agencies and many other lasting endeavours. Family First began the same way. And as you no longer have to be a member of a particular denomination to be admitted to these hospitals, schools or retirement villages, so it is with Family First. And whilst our Christian heritage is something we are both proud of and grateful for, Family First today is independent of any church or denomination. In the above schools, hospitals and aged care examples, the focus is on the best medicine, the best education, the best aged care. Family First works on the same principles. |
|
Australian Christians [View responses to all questions from the Australian Christians]
|
|
Democratic Labour Party of Australia [View responses to all questions from the Democratic Labour Party of Australia] The DLP does not support a National Curriculum. The problem considered by this question has existed in Australian schools for many years, a National Curriculum will further narrow the scope of teachers in the classroom. There has been a move away from teaching History and Literature (certainly, older classical texts) and this has reduced the cultural literacy of young people. For some years now universities have offered courses to assist students understand Biblical concepts which they might encounter in literature studies which indicates the seriousness of the problem.The National Curriculum could include compulsory studies in Western Civilization. However, anything mandated by a National Curriculum is also circumscribed by it.The Bible is a foundational text in Western Civilization and all students should be familiar with it. |
|
Australian Labor Party [View responses to all questions from the Australian Labor Party]
|
|
Liberal Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Liberal Democratic Party]
|
|
Christian Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Christian Democratic Party] We are very careful about imposing a national curriculum upon the States, however we need to have a consultative approach with the state education ministers/departments. We would seek to have the true history related including information of life as it was for our developing nation, emphasising the reasons decisions were made. We would like history to be taught in a way that we can take people back to the time and “experience” life as it was. |
|
Prayer in parliamentAustralia’s western, liberal democracy owes much to its Christian heritage. Will your party commit to continue opening parliament each day exclusively with the Lord’s Prayer? |
|
Australian Christians [View responses to all questions from the Australian Christians]
|
|
Christian Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Christian Democratic Party] Our Party fully supports the parliament opening with exclusively praying the Lord’s Prayer every day. |
|
Rise Up Australia Party [View responses to all questions from the Rise Up Australia Party]
RUAP will commit to opening parliament each day exclusively with the Lord’s Prayer, and will introduce prayer sessions for any parliamentary staff who wish to attend.
|
|
Family First [View responses to all questions from the Family First] Yes, Family First continues to support opening parliament each day with the Lord’s Prayer. |
|
Liberal Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Liberal Democratic Party]
The government should exist to protect the rights of its citizens, irrespective of their race or religion. There should be an absolute separation of church and state.
|
|
Australian Labor Party [View responses to all questions from the Australian Labor Party]
|
|
Liberal National Coalition [View responses to all questions from the Liberal National Coalition]
|
|
Democratic Labour Party of Australia [View responses to all questions from the Democratic Labour Party of Australia] The DLP is committed to opening parliament each day exclusively with the Lord’s Prayer. |
UnemploymentYouth unemployment has remained at around 25 percent since 2009. How will your party create more meaningful jobs for young people? Will your party support the recommended $50 a week increase to Newstart? |
|
Rise Up Australia Party [View responses to all questions from the Rise Up Australia Party]
RUAP is committed to having jobs available for all Australians who wish to work. To this end we will support the establishment of new Technical Colleges, in partnership with industry. These TAFES will provide high quality training for apprentices, as well as alleviating the skills shortage in traditional trades. They will also allow students the opportunity to complete their high school education while doing their apprenticeship. We will look at phasing out government funding for privately provided VET where TAFES can provide the same education and training.
RUAP believes that it is wrong to make pre-election promises to increase any allowances while we have a spiralling debt. We will however look at the issue when elected.
|
|
Liberal National Coalition [View responses to all questions from the Liberal National Coalition]
|
|
Family First [View responses to all questions from the Family First]
|
|
Australian Christians [View responses to all questions from the Australian Christians] How will your party create more meaningful jobs for young people?
Will your part support the recommended $50 a week increase to Newstart?
|
|
Democratic Labour Party of Australia [View responses to all questions from the Democratic Labour Party of Australia] The DLP is committed to developing Australian manufacturing and promoting research and development programs. Both these areas are ways in which youth can access meaningful employment and develop employment skills. In The hope of encouraging similar responses from other politicians and business leaders, Senator Madigan has committed his pay rise of $40,000 per year to assisting young people purchase equipment to enable them to learn employment skills.Yes. It is difficult for the unemployed to effectively continue seeking employment when living in difficult financial circumstances for long periods of time. |
|
Australian Labor Party [View responses to all questions from the Australian Labor Party]
|
|
Liberal Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Liberal Democratic Party] The LDP supports a free market in labour and would abolish the minimum wage.It is a fact of economics that the minimum wage creates unemployment. If a worker has a productivity of $6/hour but the minimum wage is $8/hour then they will never be employed.If the minimum wage was abolished then people with low productivity (generally the young and unskilled) would be able to sell their labour at the market rate and find a job. It is simply untrue that this would lead to significant wage cuts as most people are already paid more than the minimum wage. |
|
Christian Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Christian Democratic Party]
|
|
Homelessness and housing affordabilityRoughly 105,000 Australians are homeless on any given night. According to Anglicare, less than one percent of private rental dwellings in Sydney and the Illawarra are affordable for people on low incomes. A similar crisis of affordability exists in other cities. How will your party tackle homelessness and housing affordability? |
|
Australian Labor Party [View responses to all questions from the Australian Labor Party] Homelessness and housing affordability
|
|
Christian Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Christian Democratic Party] There are many causes of homelessness including lack of funds, anti-social behaviour, drug addiction, mental illness, loss of employment and family breakdown, each requiring different approaches to bring long term solutions.
|
|
Liberal Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Liberal Democratic Party]
Homelessness is caused by poverty and the high price of property. The Liberal Democrats (LDP) have comprehensive policies at addressing both of these issues.
Strict planning laws, burdensome regulations and meddling bureaucracies create a significant block on housing supply and decrease the amount of property development. The LDP supports the relaxation of planning/zoning laws to allow greater development. This will increase the supply of affordable housing.
The major cause of poverty is unemployment and the LDP is the only political party willing to do what is necessary to solve unemployment – abolish the minimum wage. It is a fact of economics that the minimum wage creates unemployment. If a worker has a productivity of $6/hour but the minimum wage is $8/hour then they will never be employed.
If the minimum wage was abolished then people with low productivity (generally the young and unskilled) would be able to sell their labour at the market rate and find a job. It is simply untrue that this would lead to significant wage cuts as most people are already paid more than the minimum wage.
|
|
Family First [View responses to all questions from the Family First]
While governments embraced the opportunity to make huge profits by stifling the release of land and then drip-feeding it out at massively inflated prices, they were also responding to a wider ideological agenda driven by a powerful planning community that sought to curb the size of our cities. ‘Urban consolidation’ or ‘Urban Densification’ became the new mantra. What has not been discussed is the impact that huge amounts of household income going into overpriced housing is having on our economy. That household income should be going into other sectors of the economy. |
|
Democratic Labour Party of Australia [View responses to all questions from the Democratic Labour Party of Australia] The DLP has historically been known for standing up for the least, the lost and the last. This certainly describes people who face homelessness. The DLP will support a range of initiatives to tackle this issue and the issue of housing affordability. In particular, the DLP has a plan to tackle the current problems within public housing.The DLP believes that all public housing must be owned and have title held by either Federal, State or Municipal governments to provide security of tenure, with an immediate freeze on all sales and gifting of public housing properties (aka stock transfers) to social/ community housing sector and housing associations. When compulsory acquisitions take place, the property must be replaced in the same area on a like-for-like basis. Public housing rental rates should be capped at 25% of earnings, with the provision of 15% for people in ill health and for people with disabilities.
Public housing should be administered by appropriate government departments, not out sourced to non-government appointed and paid companies.
|
|
Liberal National Coalition [View responses to all questions from the Liberal National Coalition]
The Coalition’s commitment to cutting red and green tape by $1 billion every year across the economy will help reduce the cost of construction, making new housing more affordable. Restoring the Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC) will prevent industrial problems from causing additional costs and delays. By keeping disputes to a minimum the ABCC helped to increase productivity and lower construction costs around Australia. The Coalition’s plan to combat homelessness focuses on actions, rather than rhetoric. We believe that the Federal Government has a role in working with the States and Territories to be more active in addressing homelessness and problems in social housing. Following the 2007 election, Kevin Rudd promised to halve homelessness by 2020. However, under the Labor Government, the housing shortage has increased to 228,000, rents have risen by more than 30 per cent and homelessness has increased by 17 per cent. The current government has also failed to reach its interim target of reducing homelessness by 7 per cent by 1 July 2013 as foreshadowed in a recent report from the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO). Furthermore, the Government left homelessness services and homeless people in limbo for months before finally committing a last minute patch-up deal to fund the National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness (NPAH) until July 2014. They have offered no certainty beyond that. The Coalition is committed to combating the many complex causes of homelessness, supporting homeless Australians with real, practical assistance and preventing even more Australians from falling into homelessness. |
|
Australian Christians [View responses to all questions from the Australian Christians]
|
|
Rise Up Australia Party [View responses to all questions from the Rise Up Australia Party]
Rise Up Australia Party (RUAP) will try to eliminate homelessness and deficiencies in aged-care by a variety of policies, including making low-cost housing more affordable by, inter alia, releasing more residential land, providing more jobs in rural/regional areas, and by substantially assisting the existing support agencies (such as Salvation Army etc) to provide low-cost communal housing and rehabilitation/job-training services. |
|
Treatment of charities and not-for-profitsChurches, charities and schools help build stronger communities and provide a social safety net. Often this work saves taxpayers’ money. Will your party support continuing the presumption of public benefit for not-for-profits and churches for tax purposes? |
|
Australian Labor Party [View responses to all questions from the Australian Labor Party]
|
|
Christian Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Christian Democratic Party] WE will continue to support the not-for-profit and the churches as being for a significant public benefit to retain eligibility to tax concessions. |
|
Liberal Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Liberal Democratic Party]
The LDP advocates the withdrawal of governments from delivery of social welfare to allow the re-establishment of a viable civil society.
We do not support tax exemption for organisations that are mere political advocates (eg Greenpeace). However, we favour tax exemption for those that actually deliver welfare benefits to those who genuinely need it.
|
|
Family First [View responses to all questions from the Family First]
|
|
Democratic Labour Party of Australia [View responses to all questions from the Democratic Labour Party of Australia] The DLP believes the public benefit of charitable and social work conducted by not for profit groups and churches far exceeds the underestimated economic benefits to the Australian community.The DLP supports continuing the presumption of public benefit for not-for-profits and churches for tax purposes. |
|
Liberal National Coalition [View responses to all questions from the Liberal National Coalition]
|
|
Australian Christians [View responses to all questions from the Australian Christians]
|
|
Rise Up Australia Party [View responses to all questions from the Rise Up Australia Party]
RUAP will support churches remaining not-for-profits under the taxation act.
|
|
Problem gamblingThe social harm of poker machines is undisputed. Each year 95,000 problem gamblers lose about $5 billion on poker machines alone. What will your party do to curb their use? Will your party support the introduction of $1 bets as recommended by the Productivity Commission? |
|
Australian Labor Party [View responses to all questions from the Australian Labor Party]
|
|
Christian Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Christian Democratic Party]
|
|
Liberal Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Liberal Democratic Party]
|
|
Family First [View responses to all questions from the Family First]
|
|
Democratic Labour Party of Australia [View responses to all questions from the Democratic Labour Party of Australia] The DLP policy is for the removal of all poker machines across Australia. As many licenced venues have a legal right to continue the operation of poker machines for up to 2022 the DLP believes everything must be done to curb the negative effects they have on society and on family life.The DLP not only supports this recommendation, but has already proven to do so: DLP Senator John Madigan is a Co-sponsor of the Poker Machine Harm Reduction ($1 Bets and other measures) Bill 2012 which is currently before the Senate. |
|
Liberal National Coalition [View responses to all questions from the Liberal National Coalition]
One of the fastest growing places to gamble is online. The Coalition appreciates there are serious community concerns surrounding the promotion of live online odds during the broadcast of sporting events on television and radio, particularly as it can expose children to gambling. We want Australian children to know what a lineout, wicket, scrum, goal, basket or mark is long before they know what the odds are in a game. The Coalition has called on the broadcasting industry to act to limit advertising and we welcome the steps they have already taken to limit promotions and advertising. We will continue to monitor the broadcasters’ standards and practices to ensure they meet community expectations. |
|
Australian Christians [View responses to all questions from the Australian Christians] What will your party do to curb their use?
Will your party support the introduction of $1 bets as recommended by the Productivity Commission?
|
|
Rise Up Australia Party [View responses to all questions from the Rise Up Australia Party]
RUAP will support the introduction of $1 bets as recommended by the Productivity Commission.
|
Environment – SustainabilityWe have an obligation to be good stewards of our natural environment. How will your party work towards a sustainable future for the generations to come? |
|
Australian Christians [View responses to all questions from the Australian Christians]
1. Recognising our shared global responsibility in reducing pollution.
2. Land use management which enhances environmentally sustainable development.
3. Protecting natural biodiversity and areas of significance.
4. Ensuring water and air quality for a. human health and b. the living environment.
5. Managing vegetation and ensuring soil quality for sustainable agricultural production and long-term food security.
6. Improving waste management and improving waste recovery.
7. Protection and enhancement of shoreline, estuarine and riparian zones.
8. Ensuring sustainable resource development.
9. Moving towards sustainable and balanced production and consumption.
10. Promoting technologies and initiatives which enhance improved sustainability.
|
|
Liberal Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Liberal Democratic Party] The LDP values the natural environment within the context of a prosperous society that provides equal protection under the law and is based on respect for individual freedom, personal responsibility, small government and the defence of private property. |
|
Rise Up Australia Party [View responses to all questions from the Rise Up Australia Party]
RUAP will ensure that Australia’s natural resources (forestry, minerals, fisheries, agriculture, water, biodiversity etc) and unique environments are managed wisely in accord with rational science and not by ideological environmental mantras; we therefore advocate expansion of scientific research by Australians on such areas as the marine environment, ecosystems, timber, agriculture etc. We do not acknowledge global warming and climate change (although devastating), as a reality in contemporary times, but rather a shadow governmental agenda to bring in taxes and enslave societies. We specifically acknowledge natural seasonal and generational climatic fluctuations as normality. For example, we have seen cyclical ice-melts, climatic changes in temperature, seasonal flooding which are all a normal part of living in the Earth’s dynamic ecosystems and various geographic locations. We do not support a notion of anthropogenic climate change (human induced). We do not support climatic tax and will work to completely abolish this tax.
|
|
Christian Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Christian Democratic Party]
|
|
Australian Labor Party [View responses to all questions from the Australian Labor Party]
|
|
Liberal National Coalition [View responses to all questions from the Liberal National Coalition]
The Coalition will adopt a practical, balanced and sustainable approach to environmental issues based on linking sound scientific findings with the needs of all users resulting in more sustainable commercial activities and better environmental outcomes. |
|
Democratic Labour Party of Australia [View responses to all questions from the Democratic Labour Party of Australia] The DLP has extensive policies on the Environment and was the first advocate of the establishment of National Parks. Stewardship is inherently about nurturing the environment for the good of all – this includes both responsible agricultural practices and the conservation of flora and fauna. The DLP’s policy of decentralization aims to ease the overcrowding of cities and the development of regional areas. This is an effective way of de-stressing the urban environment and preserving the natural environment. |
|
Family First [View responses to all questions from the Family First]
|
Embryonic Stem Cell ResearchIn 2006, laws were passed allowing the cloning and destruction of human embryos for medical research. Embryonic stem cell research has not succeeded, but scientists have been able to use adult stem cells to achieve the same purpose, avoiding the ethical concerns. Will your party support a review of laws allowing the cloning and destruction of human embryos? |
|
Australian Christians [View responses to all questions from the Australian Christians]
|
|
Australian Labor Party [View responses to all questions from the Australian Labor Party]
|
|
Rise Up Australia Party [View responses to all questions from the Rise Up Australia Party] RUAP will support a review of laws allowing the cloning and destruction of human embryos. |
|
Liberal National Coalition [View responses to all questions from the Liberal National Coalition]
|
|
Liberal Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Liberal Democratic Party]
|
|
Family First [View responses to all questions from the Family First]
|
|
Christian Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Christian Democratic Party]
|
|
Democratic Labour Party of Australia [View responses to all questions from the Democratic Labour Party of Australia] The DLP utterly rejects cloning and the destruction of human embryos.Such is our commitment to the protection of Life that rather than being simple policy the DLP has enshrined in its Constitution the following:“The Democratic Labour Party shall uphold principles of liberty intended to affirm the sacredness of human life, from conception until natural death, as the fundamental basis for all human rights.” Unless someone totally accepts that principle they cannot be a member of the DLP. |
|
AbortionData from the Consultative Council on Obstetric and Paediatric Mortality and Morbidity (Victoria) shows that in 2009 42 out of 196 babies who were aborted for “abnormalities” survived abortions but died neo-natally. It also shows that in 2009 that more than 200 late-term abortions were performed on healthy, viable babies because of maternal psychosocial reasons when there was a healthy mother and healthy baby. Will your party support removing Medicare funding for abortions carried out on babies who are viable outside the womb? Will your party support a ban on Medicare funding for abortions for the purpose of sex-selection? |
|
Australian Christians [View responses to all questions from the Australian Christians]
|
|
Australian Labor Party [View responses to all questions from the Australian Labor Party]
|
|
Rise Up Australia Party [View responses to all questions from the Rise Up Australia Party]
RUAP will support removing Medicare funding for abortions carried out on babies who are viable outside the womb.
RUAP will also support a ban on Medicare funding for abortions for the purpose of sex-selection.
|
|
Liberal National Coalition [View responses to all questions from the Liberal National Coalition]
|
|
Liberal Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Liberal Democratic Party]
The LDP supports privatisation of the health system including insurance. Therefore Medicare should not fund abortions as it ought to be a matter for negotiation between the insurer and the insured.
Except for special cases, the LDP opposes abortion when the foetus would be viable if born. Broadly speaking that is the last trimester. Prior to that it considers it a private matter for the mother (and potentially the father).
|
|
Family First [View responses to all questions from the Family First]
|
|
Christian Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Christian Democratic Party] We are opposed to abortion and would support the banning of Medicare funding of abortions. |
|
Democratic Labour Party of Australia [View responses to all questions from the Democratic Labour Party of Australia]
The DLP does not support Medicare funding for any abortion.
As stated in the previous answer the Democratic Labour Party affirms the sacredness of human life, from conception until natural death, as the fundamental basis for all human rights;
DLP Senator Madigan has a Bill before the Senate at the moment The Health Insurance Amendment (Medicare Funding for Certain Types of Abortion) Bill 2013 which is seeking to remove Medicare funding for all abortions conducted on the grounds of Gender Selection.
|
|
Abortion DataIt is estimated that about 80,000-100,000 abortions are performed in Australia each year, but obtaining accurate figures is difficult because most states do not collect abortion data. What will your party do to obtain more accurate and complete abortion data in line with the cross-party recommendation of the 2008 Senate inquiry into the Health Insurance Regulations? |
|
Australian Christians [View responses to all questions from the Australian Christians]
|
|
Australian Labor Party [View responses to all questions from the Australian Labor Party]
|
|
Rise Up Australia Party [View responses to all questions from the Rise Up Australia Party]
RUAP will call for all abortions to be recorded and reported on a State by State basis.
|
|
Liberal National Coalition [View responses to all questions from the Liberal National Coalition]
|
|
Liberal Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Liberal Democratic Party] The LDP regards abortion as largely a private matter. The only data it might support collecting is abortions when the foetus would be viable if born. |
|
Family First [View responses to all questions from the Family First] Family First supports calls to obtain more accurate and complete data on abortion at a national level. |
|
Christian Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Christian Democratic Party]
|
|
Democratic Labour Party of Australia [View responses to all questions from the Democratic Labour Party of Australia] The current DLP Bill before the Senate for removal of Medicare Funding for Gender Selection abortions has met with only one area of defence from those opposed to it. Those opposed simply state there is no evidence to show that this practice is occurring here. Our evidence shows differently but even so, the argument put up in opposition is simply stating that they don’t know because “we don’t keep any data”.The DLP believes data should be recorded for all abortions being conducted in Australia, not just for those conducted for Gender Selection Purposes. |
Indigenous welfareSocial justice for indigenous people remains a major issue. What initiatives and policies will your party introduce to ensure not only better health, housing, education and employment opportunities for indigenous Australians, but also to facilitate long-term social inclusion and a sense of hope and purpose? What will your party do during the next term of parliament to specifically address these goals? |
|
Australian Christians [View responses to all questions from the Australian Christians]
|
|
Australian Labor Party [View responses to all questions from the Australian Labor Party]
|
|
Liberal National Coalition [View responses to all questions from the Liberal National Coalition]
Indigenous people will be at the heart of a Coalition government in word and deed. The Coalition understands that education and employment are the pathways to prosperity and well-being for all Australians. A Coalition Government will accelerate action to replace the inaction of the labor Government on Indigenous affairs. We will end labor’s overly bureaucratic processes and deliver the support and infrastructure that Indigenous Australians were promised but failed to receive under Labor. Providing opportunities for Indigenous Australians requires pragmatic, ‘on the ground’ solutions – not the spin and empty rhetoric of labor. The Coalition will seek to empower Aboriginal people to take their future into their own hands. |
|
Democratic Labour Party of Australia [View responses to all questions from the Democratic Labour Party of Australia] The DLP recognises that successive Governments have made promises to help the plight of indigenous Australians however have taken a very top down approach. The DLP will put pressure onto the Government to not simply talk to indigenous Australians about problems they face, but rather, listen to the solutions indigenous communities are offering and take them on board. The DLP believes we need to work with indigenous Australians, not simply enforce an unworkable grand plan upon them. |
|
Christian Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Christian Democratic Party]
|
|
Liberal Democratic Party [View responses to all questions from the Liberal Democratic Party]
Previous policies towards aboriginals have either aimed at forcing integration or forcing cultural separation. The LDP does not believe the government should be trying to integrate or separate any community in Australia. We support natural and voluntary multiculturalism but we oppose government funded or guided multiculturalism. Culture should be allowed to evolve naturally.
The problems with Aboriginal society are not caused either by the Aboriginals or by society/history. The problem is the current incentives created by the government. The government needs to introduce secure private property rights for Aboriginals and then remove all race-based legislation and remove current regulations, taxes and restrictions that prevent Australians from achieving their goals.
Aboriginal Australians should be treated like adults, not children.
|
|
Rise Up Australia Party [View responses to all questions from the Rise Up Australia Party]
We recognise the aboriginal people as the first people of the land. We encourage them to accept our governmental apology and move forward as we work together towards equality, harmony and fairness for all Australians. We at Rise up Australia party understand that one of the major elements to moving forward with the indigenous people is to recognise that no sum of monetary support is going to be effective, or productive, when dealing with these communities. We understand that a human is comprised of three parts, spirit, soul and the physical body. When dealing with the indigenous groups we must see that physical needs, homes, money and other compensations are not the best solution for spiritual peoples. We aim to love the indigenous people and meet them at a spiritual level understanding that the land, its possession, their land rights and stewardship roles mean more to these people than any sum of money. To meet them at a multi-dimensional level is what we propose.
|
|
Family First [View responses to all questions from the Family First]
|
See Also:
Tony Abbott and Islamophobia: The greatest hits
Sept 5 2013
By: Suleiman Ali Baig
Source: IslamAustralia.com
http://islaminaustralia.com/2013/09/05/tony-abbott-and-islamophobia-the-greatest-hits/
When trying to appeal to Muslim voters in Western Sydney, Tony Abbott, made an outstanding comment to a gathering of five-hundred or so Muslims at an event marking the end of Ramadan, such a comment no doubt impressed upon anyone who gave regard to the values multiculturalism:
“I am the sworn enemy for anyone who seeks to divide Australian over Australian on issues of class, gender, birth place, race and particularly over faith. I believe that all religious faiths seek to come to grips with the complexity of human condition. We have to respect the specialness of that faith to every person.” [1]
The problem was that this was of course Tony Abbott speaking; the same Tony Abbott who has a history of rash Islamophobic comments and a penchant for ‘rewriting’ history with other lies. [2] On this basis, Denise Allen, former Victorian State MP for Benalla is justified in referring to Abbott as a “blatant liar” and a “fraud.” [3]
For the purposes of this article, let us put aside his displayed willingness to stay quiet whilst Islamophobes connected to his own party have made derisive and even bigoted comments about Islam, the following is a brief list of quotes outlining the true nature of Abbott concerning Muslims; an eye-opening reminder for any Muslim or true supporter of multiculturalism.
1) The burqa ban
Only a month after his passionate speech, the one in which he assured his ‘would-be’ Muslim voters that he was a sworn enemy to anyone who would divide Australian over Australian on issues especially pertaining to faith, Abbott commented on the acceptability of the burqa in Australia, essentially negating what he had said a mere month ago by saying:
”Frankly, it’s not the sort of attire that I would like to see widespread in our streets” [4]
Frankly, it makes little sense to ban a form of attire which some women wear out of choice rather than coercion [5], Abott’s dislike for it to be widespread is not only unrealistic but beside the point.
Regarding Abbott’s comment itself, Maha Abdo, Executive Officer of the Muslim Women’s Association said:
“Such statements are at best ignorant and at worst a deliberate attempt to target the Australian Muslim community” [6]
In their official press release, the Muslim Women’s Association said:
“Surely a country that values freedom and prides itself on its multicultural nature can accept the decision of a small minority of the community to dress in a manner that accords with the tenets of their faith. Such basic human rights are guaranteed in International Human Rights documents that Australia has ratified. Furthermore, freedom of religion is one of the very few rights embedded in our Australian constitution and one which we are disturbed and disappointed to hear is being compromised when it comes to discussions about Muslim Women.” [7]
2) On preachers of hate
During the right-wing Dutch MP Geert Wilders visit, Abbott explained that although Wilders views on Islam were “substantially wrong,” he was nonetheless “entitled to his viewpoint.” [8] Abbott, however, did not deem Taji Mustafa, a Muslim speaker from the UK (who visited Australian roughly during the same period) [9] to be worthy of such a right. Abbott referred to him as a “preacher of hate.” [10]
He also said in reference to him:
“I don’t think we need the preachers of hate in this country” [11]
And:
“We certainly shouldn’t be giving visas to people who are the people of hate.” [12]
Alarmingly, all of these excitable comments could have been applied to Wilders himself.
3) The segregation issue
At an open event intended for Muslims by Muslims, Abbott took issue to the fact that the event was segregated (which is generally seen as an acceptable practice by those that tend to go to Muslim events):
“I just think it’s un-Australian what’s happened here and I can’t understand for a second why Melbourne University would tolerate it” [13]
It’s odd how the leader of the opposition found it all too easy to create a political agenda out of this particular matter when the University of Melbourne’s Vice-Chancellor, Glyn Davis, barely had any objection to said segregation. Davis explained that although he does not personally support segregation, it is well within peoples’ rights to do so at such events, he also further pointed out the hypocritical nature of Abbott’s assertion by saying:
“When Tony Abbott finds it “absolutely extraordinary that a great liberal institution would take a huge leap back into the dark ages”, he defends liberalism by ignoring other liberal values such as tolerance and freedom of assembly.” [14]
4) “Baddies versus baddies”
When explaining the current crisis in Syria, which has seen the deaths of several innocents, Abbott explained:
“It’s not goodies versus baddies, it’s baddies versus baddies and that’s why it’s very important that we don’t make a very difficult situation worse.” [15]
This reductionist approach would be laughable were it not for the fact that this was perhaps the next Prime Minister of Australia who was speaking. Current Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, commented on Abbott’s overly simplistic analysis saying:
“The last time I used the term goodies and baddies, I think was when I was playing cowboys and Indians, in the back garden. I think I stopped doing that at the age of ten.” [16]
He also explained that such a comment proved that Abbott lacked any foreign affairs credibility:
“My single comment to Mr Abbott is this: International relations is more complex than a John Wayne western” [17]
5) Lastly, the piece de resistance…
Held up by a woman with a shopping trolley, the following interchange takes place between Abbott and the aforementioned woman:
Old woman with a shopping trolley: I want to be in a country that’s not going to be run by Muslims.
Tony Abbott: I understand what you’re saying ma’am, and as I said the important thing is to make the borders secure and that way people will be happier that the right people are coming to our country. [18]
In other words, does he mean to say that “when I become Prime Minister, I won’t let these Muslims in?”
With all these comments and more, it is no wonder that former Prime Minister Paul Keating regards Abbott as an “intellectual nobody” who lacks any policy ambition. [19]
Finally, we leave you with one last comment made by the former Prime Minister reminding us all that Abbott’s rise to power won’t just be a ‘head-ache’ for Muslims…but for everyone:
“If Tony Abbott ends up the prime minister of Australia, you’ve got to say, God help us.” [20]
See Also:
VIDEO: How the Australian House of Representatives votes are counted – AEC
An explanation of how the voting system works for the House of Representatives.
See Also:
True Khilāfah and the reality of political power
Source: http://muwasala.org/
At a time of political turmoil in the Muslim world, Sayyidī al-Ḥabīb `Umar bin Ḥafīẓ (may Allāh preserve him and benefit us by him) expounds on some of the meanings of khilāfah and clarifies the reality of political power. This is an extract from a Rawḥah lesson in Imam Abū Ṭālib al-Makkī’s book, Qūt al-Qulūb with some additions for extra clarity. The lesson took place in Dār al- Muṣṭafā, Hadhramout Yemen on 21st Ramaḍān 1434 / 30th July 2013.
There are two types of khilāfah. The first is the outward khilāfah which relates to political power, which is not noble and honourable in itself. Anyone may attain political power, whether they be pious or corrupt, whether they be a believer or a disbeliever, whether they be a Prophet or a wretched person.
The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said:
“Had this material world (dunyā) weighed even the wing of a gnat in Allah’s estimation, He would not have given a disbeliever a glass of water from it to drink.”
The second type is the khilāfah of prophethood, which is a noble and lofty thing. It relates to understanding the speech of Allah, to our connection with Him, to attaining a pure heart and attaining His pleasure. It is the preserve of the Prophets and their followers, the pious people in every time and place. No disbeliever or corrupt person may come close to it, nor someone with arrogance or pride in their heart. It began with two people on the face of the earth: Ādam and Ḥawā’ (Eve) and it continues to this day. If there were only two of us on the earth and we obeyed Allah’s commands in a state of truthfulness and sincerity we would be the khulafā’ of Allah on the earth, without anyone calling us a president or a minister or a leader. This is the khilāfah we should seek. Many Muslims have no desire to attain it, although it is the greatest form of khilāfah.
Sayyidunā `Alī combined the inward and the outward khilāfah, and after him Sayyidunā al-Ḥasan, until he relinquished power. At this point the inward khilāfah, which cannot be affected by evil, became separated from the outward khilāfah, which is subject to oppression and misguidance. Those who possess the inward khilāfah will intercede for others on the Day of Judgement, whereas those who possessed the outward khilāfah will await judgement. If they were just, they will be saved and if they were oppressive, they will be destroyed. Shaykh al-Sha`rāwī said that one of the wisdoms behind the existence of oppressive rulers is that they cause people to hate oppression.
If we study history we find that more often than not political power over the centuries has been in the hands of disbelievers and corrupt people. Many of the Messengers were sent to their people while political power was in the hands of disbelievers. Sayyidunā Nūḥ spent 950 years amongst his people as the khalīfah of Allah while political power was in the hands of disbelievers.
The inward khilāfah was in the hands of Sayyidunā Mūsā and the outward khilāfah was in the hands of Fir`aun. Mūsā said to his people: seek Allah’s assistance and be patient, for the earth belongs to Allah, and He bequeaths it to whomever He wishes from among His slaves – whether they be believers of disbelievers. However, the end is only for the people of taqwā. So be someone who possesses taqwā and do not concern yourself with the outward khilāfah. The tyrants may threaten you and try to kill you, but the people of the inward khilāfah seek Allah’s assistance and rely on Him alone.
Look at the life of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, the master of the people of khilāfah, and the imām of all people. For forty years before receiving revelation he was not in a position of leadership or power. He was, however, presiding over the inward khilāfah and was known as al-Amīn, ‘the Trustworthy One.’ People trusted him and consulted him in their affairs. After receiving revelation he spent thirteen years in Makkah, during which time power was in the hands of people like Abū Jahl. Outwardly he was under their rule but inwardly he was the greatest khalīfah of Allah on the earth. In al-Madīnah he was confronted by hostility from the Jews, the Hypocrites and the polytheists. It was only after eight years that he finally entered Makkah at the age of sixty-one. He only ruled over Makkah for two years before his death. This did not, however, detract from his khilāfah. He is the greatest khalīfah and every other khalīfah from the time of Ādam to `Īsā will be under his banner.
How can people venerate political power when this is the example of the Master of the Prophets ﷺ? Leave the rulers to their corruption and their oppression. We do not condone their oppression or follow them in committing evil. We advise them if they are ready to accept sincere advice. Meanwhile we are in a position of khilāfah, the pure khilafah mentioned by Allah: Allah has promised to those among you who believe and do good works that He will surely grant them inheritance of power (khilāfah) on the earth as He granted it to those before them; that He will make their religion firm, the religion which He has chosen for them; and He will replace their fear with security. They worship Me and do not associate partners with Me.
We are allowed to make the call to prayer, to pray, to openly teach these lessons which are broadcast to the East and the West. We do not deserve any of this. It is only through the blessings of Muhammad and his steadfastness. Makkah was only opened to him in the final years of his life, but he opened up the whole world ﷺ. We used to teach and study in a state of fear but Allah promises: He will replace their fear with security. The years passed and the regime changed and now we find ourselves in a state of ease and safety.
They offer you political power and status but we have found something pure and lofty so why do they want us to enter into something filthy? When Imam al-Ḥusayn, the son of Shaykh Abū Bakr bin Sālim was offered political power he said: “Had it had been fitting to give authority to animals we would not be content for it to be given to our horses.” This is the perspective of the pious people on political power.
The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said:
“You will greedily seek positions of leadership and it will be a cause of regret on the Day of Judgement.”
We fear that anyone who seeks power and then attains it will be left to it (without Allah’s assistance) and then be destroyed. So if you have a position of responsibility have taqwā of Allah and rule by the Sacred Law of Allah and fear Allah in the way you treat people. If you heed this advice we hope you will be saved. If not, you have chosen your own fate. Sayyidunā `Umar would say: “I wish to leave power with the bare minimum – with nothing for me or against me.” He was not proud of his position. He also said: “It is enough that one descendant of al-Khaṭṭāb be asked about his position. Do not make `Abdullāh bin `Umar the Khalīfah after me.” This was his understanding of the outer khilāfah and the responsibility it entails.
The hadith inform us that the inward and outward khilāfah will not be combined until the end of time. Prior to this there will be a period in which people heart’s and states with Allah are rectified which prepares the way for the coming of al-Mahdī. The foundation of his rule will be pure hearts. Without the presence of these hearts he will not be able to achieve anything. Someone once asked Sayyidunā `Alī why problems had arisen during his rule, whereas there had been stability during the time of Sayyidunā Abū Bakr and Sayyidunā `Umar. He replied that it was because Abū Bakr and `Umar ruled over people like me, whereas I am ruling over people like you.”
It is possible for any individual to reach the highest of ranks whatever situation they are in and whatever government they are under. Why miss out on these opportunities? We say we want to rule, we want power. Let your Lord rule. The hadith states: “If you seek it you will be left to it, but if you are sought to rule, you will be assisted in it.” Even when the people attempt to put al-Mahdī in power, he will refuse until they force him to do so. Even though he is worthy of assuming power, he does not desire it and does not attempt to gain people’s votes. Rather he is sought out and placed in power and then he receives Allah’s assistance.
Merely speaking about this issue has taken a long time, which tells you how much harm is done by entering into these struggles. So much time is lost and so much blood is spilt. So do not get involved with struggles which lead to harm and bloodshed.
May Allah unite the Muslims and remove these tribulations. May He not allow their enemies to take advantage of them by giving them weapons and then watching them kill each other. May Allah awaken the hearts of this Ummah. Let them not place their trust in anyone in the East or West. Let their trust be in You. If this is the case then everything in the East and the West will be made subservient to them.
Allah has decreed that power be in the hands of disbelievers and corrupt people. This is the way of Allah in the past and you will find no change in the way of Allah. We, however, have the opportunity to establish the rule of Allah and the Law of Allah in our homes, in our dealings with our families and friends and our neighbours. We shall shortly meet Allah and we shall return to Him. Nothing on the face of the earth will benefit us other than that which we have performed truly for Allah.