General Election
#1
Posted 19 July 2010 - 09:52 AM
http://www.guardian....gust-21-gillard
Where do you stand? What are the issues? What are the options? Who are you going to vote for?
Can someone lease explain the general situation - bear in mind I'm a Brit, so assume I know nothing of australian politics (which would be an accurate assumption).
Cleese...: Yes, it is.
#2
Posted 19 July 2010 - 10:20 AM
As long as Abbot doesn't get in, he'll probably bring back Work Choices legislation, nobody wants that.
Gillard will probably win, she'll have the pop vote going for her this time around just like Rudd did in the last election, and by that I mean "girl power." And yes, people do vote based on these kind of things believe it or not, it's not solely policy.
#3
Posted 19 July 2010 - 10:40 AM
#4
Posted 19 July 2010 - 10:48 AM
Labor will probably win the House of Reps (= Commons).
One interesting point that an outsider might not have picked up on - Julia Gillard, the Labor leader, has a strong working-class accent but since becoming leader has apparently been having lessons and now has speech mannerisms uncannily like those of Margaret Thatcher, who also learned a new accent. Julia even wore pearls when visiting the Governor General to ask for the election to be called. I doubt that she had any pearls before becoming Labor leader.
#5
Posted 19 July 2010 - 11:14 AM
One interesting point that an outsider might not have picked up on - Julia Gillard, the Labor leader, has a strong working-class accent but since becoming leader has apparently been having lessons and now has speech mannerisms uncannily like those of Margaret Thatcher, who also learned a new accent. Julia even wore pearls when visiting the Governor General to ask for the election to be called. I doubt that she had any pearls before becoming Labor leader.
you've got to be jocking..really?
why would she wanna do that? with the lessons?
#6
Posted 19 July 2010 - 11:57 AM
#7
Posted 19 July 2010 - 12:06 PM
So you're saying that she used to talk British, but then she went to Australia and learned to speak Australian, and now she's having lessons on how to speak British again?
This is great. Are all your elections like this?
Cleese...: Yes, it is.
#8
Posted 19 July 2010 - 12:30 PM
No, all elections aren't like this. I suspect it's a combination of her of accent being unpopular (it's an often-parodied accent, from that very vulnerable-to-parody class, the aspirational-lower-middle-class; I'm trying to think of a BBC sitcom that parodies the Brit version of the accent of that class) and her being the first female PM. Most Australian party leaders have university/lawyer accents, whether they be upper or working class versions of them - Julia's accent was neither (despite her being a lawyer and university-educated).
#11
Posted 20 July 2010 - 02:45 AM
And on a more serious note, Gillard's ears alone should make you want to spoil your ballot paper. If she shakes her head fast enough, she'll fly.
Every soul shall taste death.
Every soul should taste wara enib.
#12
Posted 20 July 2010 - 05:53 AM
I know, I know, Greenie. A wee joke, it was. Is she really having elocution lessons, though? It's a weird thing to do at this point in her career. I mean, she's already done pretty well with the accent she's got, being PM and all. And I imagine some people (the ones who say 'moi') would be put off voting for her if they knew she was deliberately trying to sound less like them.She was born in Wales, but AFAIK never had a Welsh accent. She isn't learning to talk British -
Moldy:
Heh-heh. Touche. Not as bad as the Yanks with their 'hanging chads', though.Gnu: At least we manage to make sure our polling booths are adequately staffed, eh?
Cleese...: Yes, it is.
#13
Posted 20 July 2010 - 09:08 AM
Dishdash, and her nose is actually unusually long and pointy - yet she's quite attractive in a non-sexual way.
And on the other side we have the Liberals (= Conservatives), lead by their 4th leader in 4 years. My chemist has a mat on his counter advertising Benadryl Chesty Cough Supressent (or something) which pictures the chesty cough monster being booted out - the CCM looks surprising like liberal leader Tony Abbott.
#14
Posted 20 July 2010 - 09:54 AM
No worries, Greenie. I prefer my humour dry, or deadpan. So I get misunderstood a lot.sorry, Gnu, busy day yesterday and humour switched off...
And you have to bear in mind that, as a cricket-playing Brit, my real-world default setting for talking to Aussies is "insult". The English are cucumber-sandwich-eating [MOD: language]; and Aussies [MOD: language]. The Ashes wouldn't be the same without this kind of in-depth analysis.
Cleese...: Yes, it is.
#15
Posted 20 July 2010 - 10:09 AM
No worries, Greenie. I prefer my humour dry, or deadpan. So I get misunderstood a lot.
And you have to bear in mind that, as a cricket-playing Brit, my real-world default setting for talking to Aussies is "insult". The English are cucumber-sandwich-eating [MOD: language]; and Aussies [MOD: language]. The Ashes wouldn't be the same without this kind of in-depth analysis.
and roll on the Ashes! I must admit, though, that I was barracking for England last Ashes ...
#16
Posted 20 July 2010 - 10:25 AM
#17
Posted 20 July 2010 - 12:00 PM
The Policies
Censorship
- Bring about the establishment of a truly national classification scheme which includes a uniform non-violent erotica rating for explicit adult material for all jurisdictions and through all media including the Internet and computer games.
- Introduce an R and X rating for computer games
- To overturn mandatory ISP filtering of the Internet and return Internet censorship to parents and individuals.
- We oppose the mandatory retention of all Australian users’ internet browsing history and emails by ISPs for at-will inspection by law enforcement agencies, and support strong judicial oversight over the ability of law enforcement to access individuals’ internet and email data.
- To bring about the development of a national sex education curriculum as a first step in preventing the sexualisation of children.
- Development of a national internet education scheme for parents.
- To enact national anti discrimination laws which make it illegal to unfairly discriminate against people or companies on the basis of job, occupation, profession or calling.
- To bring about equal numbers of women in the Parliament through enabling the Federal Discrimination Act to have jurisdiction extending to political parties.
- To create total equal rights in all areas of the law for ***, lesbian and transsexuals.
- Overturn racist laws that ban adults living in and visiting aboriginal communities in the NT from possessing erotic and sexual media.
- Ensure the sexual rights and freedoms of people with a disability and the elderly.
- To enact national pregnancy termination laws along the same lines as divorce law — which allow for legal, no-fault and guilt-free processes for women seeking termination.
- The listing of Viagra, Cialis and other drugs used to treat sexual dysfunction, on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
- Overturn restrictions on aid to overseas family planning organisations that reference abortion.
- Convene a Royal Commission into child sex abuse in the nation’s religious institutions.
- Develop global approaches to tackling child pornography which focus on detection and apprehension of the producers of the material.
- Ensure that the introduction of paid maternity leave is fair and equitable for small businesses.
- Abolish sex slavery and sexual servitude by introducing non morality-based immigration policies that allow bona-fide sex workers to work legally in Australia.
- Ending the tax exempt status for religions.
#18
Posted 21 July 2010 - 06:46 AM
Heh-heh. I did wonder when I typed out those crude generic insults (one of which described my own countrymen) whether they would be allowed to remain. So I see I was right to avoid this kind of language on this forum. Apologies to anyone who was offended.And you have to bear in mind that, as a cricket-playing Brit, my real-world default setting for talking to Aussies is "insult". The English are cucumber-sandwich-eating [MOD: language]; and Aussies [MOD: language]. The Ashes wouldn't be the same without this kind of in-depth analysis.
(And actually, it's funnier with the Mod deletions; now you'll just have to imagine what I said!).
The point is that in some cultures, what appear to be insults are actually the opposite - they're signs of friendship. I know that's a bit weird , but it's true. It's called "joshing": to tease or ridicule someone in a good-natured way.
Is this true in Islamic culture/society?
Do you josh?
Cleese...: Yes, it is.
#19
Posted 21 July 2010 - 07:14 AM
I actually heard a teacher explain that turning up to vote was mandatory, but not voting itself yesterday, essentially reassuring the student that they did not have to vote with a tone of encouragement.Way to go Phil. Just make sure that no-one connected with NSWEC or AEC finds out about your intentions. Oh. Wait a sec...
...
Imam Suyuti :ra:
#20
Posted 21 July 2010 - 09:17 AM
#21
Posted 23 July 2010 - 12:11 AM
Meh, I was under the impression you can still get out of it by citing religious views. Otherwise I need to save for a lot of one day trips to NZ.Way to go Phil. Just make sure that no-one connected with NSWEC or AEC finds out about your intentions. Oh. Wait a sec...
And on a more serious note, Gillard's ears alone should make you want to spoil your ballot paper. If she shakes her head fast enough, she'll fly.
There is a way to get out of it, even out of the fines. My politics lecturer kinda said it in the lecture last sem lol.Sort of worrying, but if the teacher thought that the student wasn't going to vote anyway, it's better that the student avoids a fine. And also, in an odd sort of way, the informal vote is a useful indication of the population's engagement with the political system, on an electorate-by-electorate basis.
#23
Posted 23 July 2010 - 09:01 AM
One interesting point that an outsider might not have picked up on - Julia Gillard, the Labor leader, has a strong working-class accent but since becoming leader has apparently been having lessons and now has speech mannerisms uncannily like those of Margaret Thatcher, who also learned a new accent. Julia even wore pearls when visiting the Governor General to ask for the election to be called. I doubt that she had any pearls before becoming Labor leader.
haha.... She will need a few lessons yet until she loses that accent. Obviously you haven't heard her speaking?
And you doubt she wore pearls beforehand?
Where do you get this stuff from? Obviously you have bad hearing and are not too concerned about being accurate.
#24
Posted 23 July 2010 - 09:02 AM
(I know nothing about 7th day Adventists - a Christian sect/denomination - except that Saturday is their holy day. As elections are always on Saturday, I wonder if they have problems with voting?) (I've emailed them to find out)
#25
Posted 23 July 2010 - 09:07 AM
Because a lot of people disliked her accent. It wasn't the classic 'Aussie' accent (which is a rural accent and now not that common for most Australians) it was a particular urban accent, as parodied on Kath & Kim. She seems to have made an attempt to talk much slower and avoid the 'moi' for 'my/'me'' etc.
you are ridiculous... you haven't heard her have you? She still says 'countroey, moey, possibilitoey'
#26
Posted 23 July 2010 - 09:15 AM
haha.... She will need a few lessons yet until she loses that accent. Obviously you haven't heard her speaking?[quote]
Obviously I have heard her speaking and have concluded that her speech mannerisms have changed.
I was wrong about the pearls - she got 'em when she became deputy PM according to an opponent:
THE personal attack on Labor's Julia Gillard has stepped up in Victoria's State Parliament with a Liberal MP attacking her hairstyle and jewellery.
"Has the new hairstyle, a bit of a rinse, and a set of pearls helped the red-headed Labor industrial relations motormouth understand what it is all about?" Liberal MP for Bass Ken Smith said in Parliament.
"She needs more than a new hairstyle and pearls. She needs to get out in the real world and talk to employers who love WorkChoices and not just to her union mates."
#27
Posted 23 July 2010 - 09:37 AM
Obviously I have heard her speaking and have concluded that her speech mannerisms have changed.
Your conclusion is that she now has a refined accent? How does it sound even remotely normal?
She is the most irritating person - so tedious to listen to... I can't handle hearing her speak, and regardless of her policy/skills (?) I would not vote for her because 4 years of hearing that voice would do my head in.
#29
Posted 23 July 2010 - 10:39 AM
Where did I say that she now has a refined accent? I said her speech mannerisms have changed.
Is your scrollbar not working?
Greenie:
but since becoming leader has apparently been having lessons and now has speech mannerisms uncannily like those of Margaret Thatcher, who also learned a new accent.
You said that she learned (sic - you may as well have said learnded.... the correct usage in Australia is learnt) a new accent - what sort of accent? A less refined accent, or a more refined accent? Obviously she would be aiming for a more refined accent - but I don't see it at all. If by learning a new accent you mean she speaks more slowly? Not really learning a new accent. She certainly prounounces things such as me, country, possibly, etc in a 'kath and kim' way even today - and if she does speak more slowly it doesn't do her any favours, as her 'drawl' is more pronounced by it.
#30
Posted 23 July 2010 - 11:13 AM
She is the most irritating person - so tedious to listen to... I can't handle hearing her speak, and regardless of her policy/skills (?) I would not vote for her because 4 years of hearing that voice would do my head in.
If that's a joke, it's not very funny.
If it isn't a joke, it's pathetic.
Cleese...: Yes, it is.
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












